Privilege Has Its Membership
Friends, Americans, humans, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Privilege, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Privilege.
The noble Caste System hath told you Privilege was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Privilege answered it.
Here under the Caste System
For the Caste is honorable
So are they all honorable
Come I to speak in Privilege’s funeral
Privilege was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Caste System says he was ambitious;
And Caste System is honorable.
Caste system brought many captives home to America
Whose labor did the general coffers fill:
Did this in Privilege seem ambitious?
When the poor hath cried, Privilege hath wept:
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:
Yet Caste System says he was ambitious;
And Caste System is honorable.
You all did see that on Juneteenth
I did thrice present him with a kingly crown,
Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?
Yet Caste System says he was ambitious
And, sure, Caste System is honorable.
I speak not to disprove what Caste System spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love Privilege once, not without cause:
What cause withholds you then, to mourn for Privilege?
O judgement! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;
My heart is in the coffin there with Privilege,
And I must pause til it come back to me.
Ron Powell
07/09/2020 @ 9:59 am
It would seem then, that you believe that ‘Caste System’ will play a pivotal role in the destruction of ‘Privilege’.
But could not do so alone.
“Et tu, Caste System?”
Would you be able to identify or describe the other societal factors or forces that would join ‘Caste System’ in bringing about the death, demise, or destruction of of ‘Privilege’?
Bitey
07/09/2020 @ 11:06 am
In this rewriting, “Caste System” is personified. It does not work as a mathematical equivalence. My purpose was to introduce “Caste System” in the same process as its euphemisms. The privilege derives from a caste system…etc. The Caste System procured the foreign labor for itself, for financial gain, and to have someone to look down upon…etc.
Often racism, privilege, and even here on BS the accusation of “hate speech” by Pannier, mangles the meaning of what racism is. Often they live in complete ignorance of the fact that the issue is and always has been a caste system. The absurd accusation of “reverse racism” disintegrates when considered against a caste system. Caste System as a character helps to destroy the lie of “reverse racism”…and puts privilege in its grave.
koshersalaami
07/09/2020 @ 11:31 am
Redefining racism as the face of a caste system is an extremely useful concept. You’re right, it makes reverse racism nonsensical. It also redefines what is characterized as reverse racism as reactive, not proactive, a concept that people who believe in reverse racism don’t get. In this respect, reverse racism is analogous to class warfare. The truth about class warfare is that it’s mainly practiced downward, not upward, like racism as opposed to like reverse racism, but the term class warfare is used by conservatives in a very similar way to the way they use reverse racism.
Bitey
07/09/2020 @ 12:07 pm
Excellent point re: “class warfare.”
Thinking about it the last few days, it occurred to me that all other methods for defining racism was nonsense. “Caste system” cuts right through it. Charles Blow wrote about it recently, talking about terms like “race relations”, etc. His column, and his point are to refer to it as “white supremacy.” I think that falls short of elucidating the system involved. Supremacy is just the top of the system. Caste system shows that an entire continuum is involved in apportioning the rights and benefits of citizenship.
Ron Powell
07/09/2020 @ 6:48 pm
Clever as it is, your rewrite must be characterized as either political analogy or a revised example of dramatic irony.
As analogy:
Racism is the belief/social construct that one group is inherently superior to another group which is inherently inferior, as the direct result of, and denoted by, specific natural physical traits or characteristics, such as skin color, eye color, hair texture, etc…
The Caste system was based on the religion of Hinduism, whilst in the Feudal system the Roman Catholic Church and in it’s beliefs were followed. The highest class for the Feudal system was the King; but in the Caste system it was the Brahmins (Priests), although the king was part of the second tier the Kshatriyas….
Castes were, and are still, occupational groups as well as elements in a religious system that accords different values and different degrees of purity to different occupations. They also are the main regulators of marriage. and inheritance rights.
Some castes were originally small-scale tribal groups who were incorporated into the Hindu kingdoms. It has been noted that there are thousands of castes in India and many different ways of ranking them, including through such cultural features as food taboos and sharing obligations, but none derive from skin colour or “race.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/race-human/Indias-caste-system
As Dramatic Irony:
Two days after the assassination of Caesar, Marc Antony summoned the Senate and managed to work out a compromise with the conspirators: they would not be punished for their actions, but all of Caesar’s orders would remain valid. The assassins quickly accepted the deal, fully expecting severe consequences. They soon realized that Antony’s clever compromise completely defeated the purpose for killing Caesar at all. His plans were still in motion. The supposed tyrannicide to free Rome from corruption ended up being one of the biggest political blunders in human history.
Thus Antony’s speech was full of dramatic irony and political rhetorical devices….
The speech is a famous example of the use of emotionally charged. rhetoric. Comparisons have been drawn between this speech and political speeches throughout history in terms of the rhetorical devices employed to win over a crowd.
—–Wikipedia
You can’t have it both ways without tortuous contortions of both language and logic…
That said…
The approach is is interesting and entertaining….
Bitey
07/09/2020 @ 8:22 pm
Must I?
I can’t?
Oh, Ron.
Ron Powell
07/09/2020 @ 8:34 pm
Oh well!
Ron Powell
07/09/2020 @ 9:31 pm
On the other hand if your intent and purpose is purely satirical, nothing of what I’ve said applies or matters as long as your explanations and observations remain consistent with the satirical construct as an art form….
Therefore, when taken as satire, your juxtaposition is nicely done and works quite well..
Bitey
07/09/2020 @ 10:07 pm
I’m hesitant to get into a granular analysis because I took your comment as rather condescending. Alas, here I am against my better judgment. It occurs to me that you did not take my title into consideration. If you have, you have not mentioned it. It is itself a clue.
Also, as I do with such things, the collection of clues and the meaning that you construct with them is the thought that I am trying to provoke. Generally, it is meant to provoke thought. The title is one of the clues. And Shakespeare’s speech is not history. It is art. It is meant to entertain and provoke thought. KS basically got the point. “Redefining racism as the face of A caste system…”.
What does the title say to you?
koshersalaami
07/10/2020 @ 1:42 am
Merriam-Webster
caste noun
\ ˈkast also ˈkäst \
Definition of caste
1 : one of the hereditary social classes in Hinduism that restrict the occupation of their members and their association with the members of other castes
2a : a division of society based on differences of wealth, inherited rank or privilege, profession, occupation, or race
b : the position conferred by caste standing : PRESTIGE
art and religion have lost caste
— F. L. Baumer
3 : a system of rigid social stratification characterized by hereditary status, endogamy, and social barriers sanctioned by custom, law, or religion
4 : a specialized form (such as the worker of an ant or bee) of a polymorphic social insect that carries out a particular function in the colony
soldier castes for fighting enemy ants
Ron Powell
07/10/2020 @ 1:17 am
As adjectives the difference between reverse and inverted
is that reverse is opposite, contrary; going in the opposite direction while inverted is changed to a contrary or counterchanged order or direction; characterized by inversion; turned upside down; reversed; opposite; contrary.
Your title is either an inversion or reversal….
It can’t be both.
The better question is: “What does it mean to you, the author?”
Shakespeare’s play ‘Julius Caesar’ is essentially historically accurate.
The Marc Antony soliloquy or ‘speech’ is indeed Shakespeare’s art.
Rapier wit and biting sarcasm aplenty….
“Redefining racism as the face of A caste system…”
may work as satire
but not as a means of characterizing “all other methods for defining racism as nonsense”…
This is especially so since:
“it has been noted that there are thousands of castes in India and many different ways of ranking them, including through such cultural features as food taboos and sharing obligations, but none derive from skin colour or “race.” ”
My comment should be no more viewed as condescending than any request for clarification.
“…the collection of clues and the meaning that you construct with them is the thought that I am trying to provoke…”
When you succeed in provoking thought, you should revel in the opportunity to expound and defend your thesis.
Accusing me of condescension is out of line and out of place here…
It smacks of the standard social media (OurSalon/ OpenSalon) canard that too many hide behind when they discover that they’re at the deep end of the pool and in over their heads….
Ron Powell
07/10/2020 @ 1:46 am
In the manner of the Socratic Method of Exploration and Discovery, the question I posited at the end of my first comment was intended to draw more into a process of elucidation. It was not in any way meant or intended as a condescending put down…
If I thought there was nothing to gain from discussing the post with you and others, I wouldn’t have commented at all….
Bitey
07/10/2020 @ 6:31 am
“It smacks of the standard social media (OurSalon/ OpenSalon) canard that too many hide behind when they discover that they’re at the deep end of the pool and in over their heads…“
I’ll address this once and then leave it alone. Picture this. You saunter in with this particular attitude. Yes, this came after several other over the top arrogant statements, but I suspect that this was beneath the surface all the while. I’m listing it first because I just sat down with my coffee. I’ll get to the others next. “In over my head”?
Your ‘tude started with this.
“Clever as it is…”. That is filthy with condescension. Even when I reread it I am positively stunned by the rudeness. It continues.
You go on with your description of the Indian caste system, as if the term can not be used metaphorically, and as if we all don’t know these things. It does not work as a metaphor if no one knows what it means. And it is a particular flight of self involvement if you think the writer does not know what his own metaphor means. It is a sort of pedantic delusion.
You conclude with this. “You can’t have it both ways…” and “The approach is is interesting and entertaining….“
Your tone is so offensive, Ron, that if you can’t see it, you should seek counseling. Were this conversation held in person, you would have experienced a severe loss of balance. And that is coming from a person who likes you. Don’t go out of your way to abuse someone who likes you, and assume that means I seek permission or approval.
Now, as for the title, your answer sucks. Here’s the fact. It is both an inversion and a reversal. It reverses an American Express ad, “membership has its privileges.” Also, used as the title, it indicates an inversion. A caste system is a pyramid. The title hints at inverting that pyramid by indicting “Privilege.” The structure and the words borrowed from Shakespeare set the scene of a eulogy where Privilege’s life is being summed up. Privilege has been taken down, as it were, with the meaning borrowed from “Julius Caesar“. It doesn’t follow what happened to Rome historically, because it is not about the history of Rome. It is about two fictional characters by anthropomorphism, Privilege and Caste System.
Finally, the photo of George Floyd and the “Black Lives Matter” poster held by the protester represent the elements which replace Privilege on the inversion of the pyramid. Floyd is being honored here, not privilege. “Black” is being honored and not that which had previously sat atop the pyramid.
No, Ron, I am not “in over my head” with something of my own creation. I am telling you in a frank manner in the hopes of resurrecting some respectful exchange, but if it is your intention to continue with this sort of thing, we wont. I wont put up with it. You have much to offer as a person, RP, but if it must come with that condescension, it is not remotely worth the time. If this “smacks of…” anything, it is that you refuse to account for your own transgression. If you can fix that, cool. If you can’t, then later.
Ron Powell
07/10/2020 @ 11:40 am
I did not intend the reference those who get in over their heads to include you.
Maybe I wasn’t clear enough on that….
I tend to be somewhat pedantic. An approach which is often mistaken as condescending….
I will apologize for causing this misunderstanding and make every effort to take a different tac going forward….
Bitey
07/10/2020 @ 11:47 am
I appreciate that, RP. I’ll take this as a lesson to be sure to be that much more thorough going forward. I regret any conflicts of a personal nature, and will welcome examination on posted subject matter.
Art W. Stone
07/10/2020 @ 11:16 am
I was not able to be online much yesterday, so I’m here a little late. That’s just as well because it took a turn wherein I would have felt like an intruder.
Much of what I was taught as a child came from people with grade school educations. Their children became my parents. The elders did not have large vocabularies, but did have an understanding about their position in society. It did not turn them against others so much as it made them wholly opposed to how it works, casting some into lesser roles. I was not taught so much about what was wrong with racism, but rather what was wrong with regarding people as being beneath me somehow. It was expected those teachings should fill me with understanding of equal treatment for all. Going to public school was my introduction to a particular brand of elitism that was built around nicknames for people based on the color of their skin. Seeing and hearing those beliefs expressed was so counter to what I had been taught that it contributed to my general loner personality. Going it alone is not easy, nor does it change others.
I’ve been doing a little reading online posted by a youngish ( maybe 35 year old ) white man, a two tour vet, who instructs, studies, and builds antique style banjos. He is scholarly and adept at his passion. He has been posting the last two months about the caste system, while not calling it that, that surrounded him in the hills he grew up in. It has been his way of fighting the injustices of such. Another excellent book I read recently is “Hillbilly Elegy” by J.D. Vance which explores the system at work among the poorest of white people and eloquently explains the belief, totally imbued in many that they will not succeed in life and were born to their destiny. It is used to show why people who do not let go of their beliefs will vote for reprehensible politicians even when to do so is the worst thing for them.
Bitey
07/10/2020 @ 1:04 pm
My current view of my country and my world is a bit difficult to put into words. As I was typing this, I even hesitated at “my country” because that is where the rift seems to have appeared in my mind. I am watching…my country struggle with things like the Rebel flag, which I found objectionable as a child. I subordinated my thoughts as a kid because I thought that the wide acceptance of such things was an indication that I did not fully understand the principles involved. The flag, or things like statues of Confederate heroes seemed pretty cut and dried to me. They were traitors. By the time I was a Marine, whenever I was officer of the day, and had the authority to make rules for the base, even though the rules only lasted for a single night, I would make all Marines with rebel flags on their POVs (cars) or gear to remove them or stow them. That was a little over 30 years ago, and I was on the extreme edge with that sort of thing. I never knew anyone who did such a thing. Now it seems like I was just ahead of my time.
My childhood was much like Richie Cunningham’s from “Happy Days”, except that Richie was White. As a kid, that discrepancy was not even noticeable…to me. I developed into something of an institutionalist. I recognize the failings of our society as practiced, but felt confident that effort within its institutions would bring any necessary change.
To say that I am not so sure that our institutions will bring necessary change is to understate it now. I am happy with my childhood, and now I also feel poisoned by a caste system. I have always valued and advocated for social justice, but I never realized the degree to which the game was just rigged. My personal circumstances have been comfortable, but the broader society is not all that it purports to be. It never has been. I have invested a lot in my support of this country. I am both proud of that, and somewhat embarrassed. There is a song from 1973 that I have always loved. “I Got the Music in Me.” My favorite lines in the song go, “I heat up, I cool down. I got words in my head, so I say them.” I turned 10 years old that Fall. I always loved the forthright nature of those lines. I have felt that way for my entire life…until now. Now I have thoughts like, my country is really full of shit…and I am extremely reluctant to express that thought. I am so far from my comfortable ignorance about my country from childhood. I am embarrassed to believe that we do not represent good in the world. We exported our caste system to South Africa and to 1930s Germany. That seems like more than just a bit of uncomfortable trivia now. It is enough to say that if I were 20-something and not 50-something, I’d be a revolutionary. Looking back, it is a bit embarrassing.