Stop! Children, What’s that Sound?
In 1966, in “For What It’s Worth”, Stephen Stills wrote, “There’s something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear…”.
Josh Hawley is the youngest Senator is the United States Senate at the tender age of 41 years. He defeated Claire McCaskill just two years ago to become the junior Senator from Missouri. He was born in Springdale Arkansas in 1979 to parents who were a banker and a teacher. He studied at Stanford University as an undergraduate, and then Yale Law school for his Juris Doctorate. Hawley does not fit the profile of an insurgent, a rebel, or an insurrectionist. Why in the world would Hawley sacrifice a comfortable future within the establishment to raise a fist in front of an angry mob, and threaten the institution that makes him an important young man? “There is something happening here.”
Today in the New York Times, Katherine Stewart has written about “The Roots of Josh Hawley’s Rage.” If you are wondering about why Josh Hawley would find himself in this position, I recommend the article. Obviously, this is a theory by Stewart, but it is a good one. And as good information tends to be, it is edifying about the broader question about what is going on in our society currently.
Stewart has written in detail about what seems to be Hawley’s philosophical underpinnings much better than I can rehash her work. I am merely pointing to it so that we might better understand our current confusion about the January 6th insurrection. There are all sorts of theories being bandied about regarding what exactly motivated the crowd laying siege to the US Capitol. “What it is ain’t exactly clear.” Other than the most obvious fact that Donald J. Trump has been pumping up his base for years, why is his base so willing to commit these crimes while holding and posing for videos and selfies? There was the convenient nonsense about ‘election irregularities.’ There has been the ‘economic anxiety’, describing the motivations since Trump first formed his coalition. There are even theories which involve racial animus, of which I have no doubt are involved to some degree. But, as it applies to the race problem in particular, this is nothing new to America, and storming the Capitol is…by Americans. What is different now?
This is not a condemnation of religion in general. If my words come across as implying that, I have failed somehow. What I do see as a problem is the style or flavor of Hawley’s religiosity. Stewart’s article makes mention of Hawley’s philosophical opposition to,
“a British-born monk who lived 17 centuries ago. In a 2019 commencement address at The King’s College, a small conservative Christian college devoted to “a biblical worldview,” Mr. Hawley denounced Pelagius for teaching that human beings have the freedom to choose how they live their lives…”—Katherine Stewart
I see this as a big problem for the type of society that we live in. This is as serious of a philosophical conflict as the actions to interfere with the function of government, in my view. Often, the discussion about current events, as they age into historical events, get discussed in ways that are misleading. This one has that potential. If you want to know next year, or ten years from now what happened 5 days ago, it would be helpful to understand how Josh Hawley thinks.
koshersalaami
01/11/2021 @ 9:05 am
Is he typical of anyone?
Bitey
01/11/2021 @ 9:10 am
In a broad sense, Hawley his quite unusual. But, Hawley is trying to stoke what he would call populism. My point is, it isn’t even that. Hawley (and Ted Cruz) are trying to grab a ready made, fanatical crowd and capture them as their own. Hawley is anti-pluralism. This movement generally is anti-pluralism. This is a different sort of concern than we are discussing generally.
jpHart
01/11/2021 @ 1:10 pm
Over the hill aren’t we?.
The old home town looks the same, no?
Almost heaven!
America needs you, Jonas Salk!
If our doomsday clock could talk.
************************************************************************************************************
Uno does not have to be an Ivy League credentialed BOND quant sequestered in La Jolla
to know that Command Error in GRIEF ought resign at high noon and plead VP Pence’s pardon unless his wretched exhibitionism yearns for compatible chain gang attire–The Donald: orange you clever?
Jonna Connelly
01/11/2021 @ 3:59 pm
I’m in a frame of mind right now that all I can think in response to Mr. Hawley is string after string of the most obscene expletives. That he hides behind an essentially religious movement should not surprise me at all. It’s all just that cynical.
Reading quickly about Pelagius made me go looking for the watchwords I was taught in Catholic school – by their works you will know them. In Matthew it’s “by their fruits” and “works” seems to be rooted in Moroni which, I believe is LDS so I’m reluctant to explore further.
Nevertheless, I have something else to do now for awhile so I will just say, “Where the hell is Jon Wolfman when you really need him?” and move on.
koshersalaami
01/12/2021 @ 12:47 am
If you want to contact Jon I can probably arrange that. I email with him from time to time. Also Lezlie. Actually, usually in the same thread.
Jonna Connelly
01/12/2021 @ 9:50 am
I’m in contact with Jon on facebook, Just not sure I want to dig into this and treat him as a resource.
Jonna Connelly
01/12/2021 @ 9:52 am
But, thanks, k.
Ron Powell
01/11/2021 @ 4:54 pm
“He is a product of the same underlying forces that brought us President Trump and the present crisis of American democracy. Unless we find a way to address these forces and the fundamental pathologies that drive them, then next month or next year we will be forced to contend with a new and perhaps more successful version of Mr. Hawley.”
—–Katherine Stewart
In light of the summation of the Hawley phenomenon offered by Ms Stewart, this comment, which I posted in another thread, bears repeating here:
“The Republicans have been seeking to establish minority rule and constitutional apartheid for decades…
Establishment Republicans didn’t want Trump because they knew that he would expose their agenda for what it is…
The next time a Republican is put in the White House, we won’t be so lucky….”
Bitey
01/11/2021 @ 5:10 pm
So much of what many prominent members of the Trump coterie have been up to makes more sense in this light. For example, I had wondered what Steve Brannon would want with establishing a right wing monastery in Italy. As it turns out, these actions mesh quite nicely with Hawley’s worldview.
It is one thing to speculate about racist motivations or whatever. I assume those to be in place. But, once we can see how their ideology works, we can begin to see why appeals to decency do not work. As congress is now contemplating new ethical rules, they can see that rules that depend on shame don’t get the job done. This movement is predatory. Their worldview is based upon the denial of your personhood, and their own. Appeals for social justice don’t work with them because they conflate personal dignity and personal power. Those who advocate for social justice elevate personal dignity over personal power.
jpHart
01/11/2021 @ 5:26 pm
“The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page.”
—-Augustine of Hippo
Contemporaneously, ‘Just a fine and fancy ramble to the zoo.’
Simon & Garfunkel:1968
koshersalaami
01/12/2021 @ 12:42 pm
I went and read the Times article. What it says is that Hawley is an ardent opponent of religious freedom. He’s essentially Christian Taliban. That turns out to be a lot of what this is about.
I’ve got no patience for guys, particularly really educated guys, who are all for Christianity but don’t bother to figure out the priorities of Jesus.
Bitey
01/12/2021 @ 1:11 pm
Were you under the impression that that is not what I said?
My point is, we are not facing racism specifically, or American conservatism, or whatever…as much as we are facing American Taliban, or Vanilla ISIS, or whatever one would call it. This is a distilled power move. It explains, I think, why certain tests about their motives fail. Why do their statements seem to not make sense, etc. The reason is that they are playing a very different game.
koshersalaami
01/12/2021 @ 10:43 pm
I got that more from the link than from here. I didn’t get the whole monk thing at first. I’m not disagreeing with you, just elaborating.
koshersalaami
01/12/2021 @ 10:44 pm
Hawley wants the world to follow Jesus Christ. Except he really doesn’t because he’s not paying close attention to Jesus himself.
Bitey
01/12/2021 @ 10:57 pm
And the trick is, being that Jesus is (shhh, dead), what they really want is the world to follow whoever is doing the talking. Jesus hasn’t done a press conference in over 2000 years.
jpHart
01/13/2021 @ 11:59 am
‘This is not a condemnation of religion in general’ (?)
we’ve been STORM TROOPED don’t make me over
pervasive PTSD post traumatic stress discombobulation
I’m gettin tennis elbow > skip – ads over under around and through 100 Top Songs of the Vietnam WAR SAWS. Right now ivy half a mind to creek out a gonzo esque expose’ all those fingerprints of substandard whoa begone Public Broadcasting what’s IT $ystemic funding obstructionists. Bitey: I maybe crazy, U maybe a little bit crazy, BUT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is CRAZY—(can’t you feel the fears I AM feeling 2day).
Going up the country, indeed.
either that/or find an after work redneck bar and strike up a conversation :re: the United Nations