Unpacking 528 years of systemic racism in the Western Hemisphere
We’ve all learned the children’s rhyme “In Fourteen Hundred Ninety-Two Columbus sailed the ocean blue…” blah, blah, blah… but most people do not know that in 1493 something called a “Papal Bull” was written by the Catholic Church called “The Doctrine of Discovery“. Essentially what the Doctrine of Discovery says is that if a “Christian discovers” a place that is occupied by non-Christians the land is uninhabited by humans.
The Doctrine of Discovery has been used to justify all sorts of crimes against humanity for 528 years. Christopher Columbus used it to justify the killing of more than a million people. It’s been cited in US Supreme Court decisions. It has been used to claim that people stolen from Africa and sent to the “New World” as slaves weren’t really people so the kidnappings, raps, murders, slavery, etc… “don’t matter”. It has been used to justify the wholesale extermination of Native Americans and the creation of “Manifest Destiny”. It was used to justify the treatment of people in Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Australia and even Hawaii and Samoa.
It is one of three foundational principles/documents of systemic racism in these United States. The other two are Manifest Destiny and the US Constitution. All three have been cited in US Supreme Court Decisions justifying all sorts of evil.
In the 1920’s the Catholic Church sent out hundreds of priests and nuns to make a determination as to whether those of us who are Not Caucasian “qualify” as human beings yet. The Catholic Church determined we are all “proto-humans” in the same way that Neanderthal Man is a “proto-human”.
Here we are in 2020, once again, dealing with the same crap we’ve been dealing with for 528 long years… while Caucasians say “I didn’t DO anything”… “I’m not responsible for what happened” and “I can’t do anything about it”. The words are excuses. They are designed to be disingenuous. They are designed to keep those whose skin isn’t “light enough” to make them Humans, according to the determination of the Catholic Church, from being treated as human beings.
I cannot speak to the African American experience but I can speak to the Native American experience with systemic racism. I welcome input and observations from African Americans so that we can start unpacking this 528 year old box of trash.
The Doctrine of Discovery was cited in US Supreme Court decisions as recently as 2005: “[1] Under the “doctrine of discovery,” Oneida II, 470 U. S. 226, 234 (1985), “fee title to the lands occupied by Indians when the colonists arrived became vested in the sovereign — first the discovering European nation and later the original States and the United States,”
The Constitution says in several places “And Indians not taxed” even as illegal immigrants (and let us be honest here, those settlers were illegal immigrants by every reasonable and rational definition of the term) continued to pour out onto these shores and Native Americans were slaughtered wholesale in the name of greed. As an example of that greed we need only look at the Black Hills in South Dakota.
In 1868 the US Government signed a treaty at a place called Fort Laramie which “pledged that the Great Sioux Reservation, including the Black Hills, would be “set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Indians.” By the terms of the treaty, cession of any part of the reservation required a new treaty executed and signed by at least three fourths of all the adult male Indians occupying the land.” That’s not what really happened though… in 1874 a man by the name of George Armstrong Custer entered the Black Hills and “discovered” gold… and timber resources galore. He and his men proceeded to talk about the resources in question until the military was overrun with “settlers” wanting what “them heathen redskins” had and proceeded to STEAL it. To the point the US Government STOLE the land and it wasn’t until the 1970’s that the case was finally adjudicated. Well, sort of. The words of my people are “The Black Hills are not for sale”. Young or old, we all say it. There’s more than a BILLION dollars in the “trust account” to pay for the Black Hills. It requires 3/4 of all males of the Lakota (Sioux) to agree to accept the money for the “sale” to go through and I don’t know more than a tiny hand full who are willing to “take the money” and abandon our sacred spaces.
The underpinnings of the United States are based on immoral beliefs of alleged racial and religious superiority. If we aren’t willing to unpack that box we aren’t going to fix the damn problem. If you aren’t willing to help unpack the box you aren’t helping People of Color.
06/13/2020 @ 6:59 pm
It has been a long time, my friend. It is good to see your name again. Old memories come up. Maybe there is a point to keeping this going after all.
To your point, however, and I think we have had this discussion before, the question before us is what what to do but rather how to do it.
For example, if I had been there when George Floyd was being murdered, what would I have done? What could I have done? They say that if you see something, you should say something.
As far as I know, no one spoke up. No one screamed,”You’re killing him,” as far as I know.
They made videos.
I don’t believe we can “defund the police” because the existing power structure won’t permit it. We really have to start on the county level, taking over the county organizations of both parties, electing state representatives, then members of congress, so that we have the power to enact change.
I figure that would take at least ten years….if we had the money to underwrite the effort. Lacking those resources, it could take twenty years….and I don’t think we have that much time left.
I am open to suggestioins.
Mrs Raptor
06/13/2020 @ 7:45 pm
I’m pretty sure that I would, at the least, have been yelling “Stop! You’re killing him deliberately!” The reality is that it’s rarely “accidental” when police kill someone. Many have been taught to start screeching “stop resisting” the instant they are questioned, as though we have no RIGHT to know why they are doing whatever.
I don’t know on “defunding” the police however; I do know that we need to end the militarization of police and immunity. I do know that instead of the taxpayers paying when police screw up the officers need to be “on the hook” personally via paying for their own liability insurance. (We make Social workers that are paid even less than police pay their own liability insurance so there’s no reason to not make police pay their own as well.) I DO know that we’ve been defunding education for more than 30 years now and the same “law and order” folks have no problem with defunding education. I DO know that police need to have a less “adversarial” relationship with the communities they serve.
How do we get from “here” to “there”? I don’t have that answer other than “through political involvement”. I can tell you that the longer it takes the more angry people are going to become and I also know that throwing scraps from the table like we’re a bunch of dogs fighting over a bone is NOT going to work this time.
Ron Powell
06/13/2020 @ 10:32 pm
“They say that if you see something, you should say something.
As far as I know, no one spoke up.
They made videos.”
If it weren’t for the video shot by an extremely courageous 17 year old girl, we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
None of the “change” we’re talking about would be taking place.
.If your behavior here is any indication of what you might have done, George Floyd would be just as dead….
“I am open to suggestioins.”
That’s pretty damned white of you.
How about you, and all the rest of the glib and loquacious white folks, sit down in a corner somewhere, shut up and listen.
Koshersalaami
06/19/2020 @ 1:23 pm
A while ago in the thread above you drew a conclusion as to what assumption of yours I told you you shouldn’t be making.
“How about you, and all the rest of the glib and loquacious white folks, sit down in a corner somewhere, shut up and listen.”
The assumption was about Mrs. Raptor’s ethnicity. She isn’t White.
Mrs Raptor
06/19/2020 @ 3:36 pm
While I am occasionally “glib” within the confines of my family circle, I am rarely loquacious. I am also rarely magniloquent.
I am Lakota. “Sioux” if one simply MUST use racist terms.
Bonnie
06/13/2020 @ 7:34 pm
Let’s get this before Congress. After all, most of them are attorneys. Also, the ACLU.
Mrs Raptor
06/13/2020 @ 8:00 pm
Bonnie, I don’t think congress CARES about the fact that systemic racism is built on this horrible religious foundation that has left more than 100 million people dead in the Western Hemisphere alone.
Ron Powell
06/13/2020 @ 10:57 pm
On November 27, 1095, Pope Urban II makes perhaps the most influential speech of the Middle Ages, giving rise to the Crusades by calling all Christians in Europe to war against Muslims in order to reclaim the Holy Land, with a cry of “Deus vult!” or “God wills it!”
In his speech he dehumanized and demonized Muslims as “the dark skinned race of people” in such a manner as to put in motion what amounted to a race war that lasted for more than 200 years…
The conflict is better known as the Crusades…
The dehumanization and demonization begun at the initiation of the Crusades, continues to this day…
The Catholic Church was clearly instrumental in the inception, perpetration, and perpetuation of what we refer to today as ‘racism’ for a period of nearly 1000 years….
Your post is spot on re the references made to faith based explanations, excuses, rationales, and justifications for racist attitudes and for the institutional and systemic racism that permeates and dominates public policy regarding the political, economic, social, and legal relationships between white people and people of color…
Well done…
Pleased to make your acquaintance…
Mrs Raptor
06/14/2020 @ 10:42 am
Through most of the last 1000 years plus of history the Popes have NOT been what anyone who is honest would call “nice people.” Just look at the 4 Medici Popes. Yes, I know, they were after the start of the Crusades and after the Doctrine of Discovery was written but the fact is they were, like their predecessors, absolute horrors.
Sad to say but these days I almost expect “Christians” to be demanding little snots in need of a spanking.
koshersalaami
06/14/2020 @ 8:21 am
Mrs. Raptor,
Wonderful to see you.
Ron,
You’re making an assumption you shouldn’t be making.
Ron Powell
06/14/2020 @ 10:20 am
“As to the Crusades, the persecution was absolutely not restricted to the brown-skinned.”
Of course Christian fanatics and extremists took the ‘Crusades’ to the point of absurdity viz a viz anyone characterized as non- Christian.
I never said that the Crusades were ‘restricted to the brown-skinned’.
Once again, you are guilty of mis-reading or misinterpretation and the responding to yourself as though you are reacting to what was actually written.
That’s not dyslexia. That’s dysfunction.
However, I make no erroneous assumptions here.
What I’ve stated is the language of the speech made by Urban II, not my interpretation of it.
He used the dark complexion of the Muslims to stoke the hostility and animosity of the northern European white folks he was addressing as a way to incentivize the common white man to go to war against the dark skinned ‘infidel’…
Clearly you haven’t read the several versions of the actual speech…
The imagery is absolutely what we would call pure unadulterated racism today…
If you feel that you could or should challenge me re the validity or veracity of any assertion I make here or elsewhere,
BRING IT!!!
Your passive aggressive disclaimer is dripping in “white privilege”.
Saying that I’m making a false or erroneous assumption without being specific about what or where it is, is like Trump saying that we all should know what ‘Obamagate’ is all about.
In my view, you are not suited to such rhetoric, and your engaging in it is quite unbecoming…
Mrs Raptor
06/14/2020 @ 12:35 pm
That’s what I thought. Since English isn’t my first language I sometimes struggle with clarity in others writing. Words with multiple meanings are sometimes difficult for me.
Since you clarified and I explained, I’m also apologizing for any confusion my response may have caused you.
koshersalaami
06/14/2020 @ 8:40 am
As to the Crusades, the persecution was absolutely not restricted to the brown-skinned. Once the Crusaders decided they were going to war with non-Christians, they of course looked to the unarmed non-Christians at home. We are all aware of our own minorities. Mine suffered thousands and thousands dead in massacres.
As we did in the Inquisition. I don’t think it was the Doctrine of Discovery in particular that was used on Jews because Jews didn’t have their own country and in most places weren’t allowed to be landowners, but it was during this period (1492) that the Inquisition started. I’ve always found it interesting that during the late Middle Ages and early Renaissance the best place for Jews to be in the world was Muslim Spain and the worst place to be in the world was Christian Spain. The Inquisition was exported to Spanish-controlled land in the Americas and Jews were hiding that faith in some form until late in the twentieth century. By then it was somewhat a mixed bag because Jews had lived as Christians for five hundred years but retained some Jewish practices in secret. Jews had to hide their religion if they (we) wanted to keep it.
To be clear, I am not engaging in anything competitive here, just filling in gaps. I would think that the treaties signed by the US Government are still legal documents and should still be able to be litigated. As to how successfully, I don’t know if it would be a better idea to push hardest after the election because the current administration isn’t friendly to any minority.
Mrs Raptor
06/14/2020 @ 10:25 am
Nice to see ya Kosh. I’ll have to write a post about why I haven’t been around.
US courts don’t use crap from the Crusades or the Inquisition for justification of racism… but they DO use the Doctrine of Discovery. The Doctrine of Discovery is a RELIGIOUS document as opposed to a LEGAL document. It has NO PLACE in legal decisions whatsoever. And yet… here we are… more than 500 years after it was published with it being used to justify stupid crap.
Ron Powell
06/14/2020 @ 11:18 am
“The Doctrine of Discovery is a RELIGIOUS document as opposed to a LEGAL document. It has NO PLACE in legal decisions whatsoever.”
Agreed!
My comment re the Crusades was made to illustrate how far back the bigotry in Christian religiosity goes and how deeply it is ingrained in Christian canon.