Pardon Me, Do You have a BLACK Senator?
Is Tim Scott right? Are liberals the real racists in America? To the uninitiated, the Tim Scott that I refer to is Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina. Recently, Senator Scott appeared with former President Donald Trump after Trump’s victory in the New Hampshire Primary. At least two other aspirants to the running mate role on the presumptive GOP ticket were also present, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Marjorie Taylor-Greene.
To say that the three Republican MAGA-Scouts were demonstrating obsequiousness would probably go unchallenged, even by the scouts. (Yes, I could have called them all lawmakers, but Ramaswamy isn’t one. I could have called them all gents, but MTG isn’t one, and I could have called them all caucasian…but Tim Scott isn’t one.) And there’s the rub. Does it matter that Tim Scott is not white, while serving in a party, and hoping to serve a candidate for the Presidency, who is openly a white supremacist?
These definitions and categories can be tricky and confusing. Ramaswamy is a Republican, and he isn’t white, but he is a caucasian. Do any of those things matter? Being white seems to matter in the GOP. Being not white seems to matter for different reasons. Those reasons typically are things like, gaining admission to this country, and how long you can stay, under what circumstances, etc. It matters in the GOP that a wall constructed on the Southern border, because that is from whence the brown people come. They don’t say it exactly like that, but not saying it is a distinction without a difference. As yet, no one has suggested putting a fence on the Northern border. Is that racist?
Liberals and conservatives both seek a better society. I think that would go unchallenged. However, what they seek, and how they would attain it seems to each to be at the cost of the other. Liberals prefer broad fairness and access as fundamental to the freedom that they think necessary for a free society. Conversely, conservatives prefer individual liberty as fundamental to the society that they seek, and they will establish their own level of access and/or fairness. Who’s right here? What came first, the chicken, or the egg/coop/collective?
I watched Senator Scott stand behind Donald Trump, and then walk up and declare his “love” for Trump, in jest, sure. Characterize it however you think necessary. One thing it certainly was was obsequiousness. Is that racist of me? I saw some headlines later of the event, and the right of center outlets, like Fox News, are calling the descriptions of the event “attacks” and “racist.” I thought, maybe, someone had referred to Scott as an ‘Uncle Tom’, or maybe a ‘house nigger’. I have seen those bandied about in previous cycles. So, I looked. All I did find, and all Hannity showed on his program were Al Sharpton saying that it was “humiliating”, and Susan Glasser asking what Scott was afraid of. She asked, “is he afraid that Donald Trump would punch him ni the nose…”. Was that racist? I’m trying, but I don’t see it. Senator Scott eventually said that it is about any Black person presuming to “get out of line”, and “think for himself…”. He called this “intimidation”, and attached a racist motivation for doing so.
I’m open to a good argument, but frankly, I don’t see one here. I have thought for myself my entire life. My parents told me that it was my right, and I trust them on that. They told me how they voted, but they never told me how to vote. I vote like they would, but that is coincidental, and not a result of instruction or indoctrination. I would not vote for the modern GOP for more reason than I could stand to list here. I will say, however, that a white supremacist, Christo-fascist regime is not in my interest as a Black man, nor is it in the interest of freedom broadly, in America or the world. I feel quite comfortable and confident of that view. That said, I know people who vote Republican see the world, their vote, and their citizenship differently from me. Personal power is an individual thing to them, and authoritarianism suits them. I get it. Somehow they see carving out their own safety and well-being in a society headed by a deeply flawed man who has already stated that he would be “a dictator”. (Forgive me if I ignore the “one day” caveat. That’s an absurdity).
Tim Scott may believe Trump when he says such things. He may also not believe him, but assume that because of his association with Trump, and his willingness to be obsequious, that his prospects are better than mine. Is he right to say that liberals like me are the real racists? I can’t see it. I’ll say this though, I will stand with anyone who will stand with me, and cooperate on a free and fair society. I think it is humiliating how Senator Scott will prostrate himself to a man such as Donald Trump, whose numerous ethical failings defy enumeration. I would find it equally humiliating if Scott had done so with Idi Amin, or Papa Doc Duvalier. But, as these sticky confusing categories go, I get the sense that Papa Doc and Idi Amin would have the good taste to not be white supremacists. Why can’t Tim Scott? Is that racist?
Suzanne
01/27/2024 @ 5:15 pm
Trump wanted a Coca-cola commercial standing behind him, i.e. devotees of every shade. It’s also about his perception of a rival, someone with competing charisma, appeal, and ability to attract attention, whom he forces to bow, tail between legs, while smiling for the camera. He did it to Mitt Romney and Chris Christie. He was cued up to do it to Nikki Haley, but oooops, those women.
He molds people to fit his narrative. Many assumed that Tim Scott was gay. Sure enough, a girlfriend was introduced with him onstage. Not only that, he was filmed on one knee proposing to her on a beach, like the Bachelor tv show. Was this Tim Scott’s idea? Or Trump’s? If Scott is indeed gay, a Black gay man marrying a white blonde Stepford woman for Trump seems tragic. Gay rumors aside, my suspicions say someone has been telling Scott what to do long before he announced he would run for the presidency. Ramaswamy likewise. Both appear as characters in a play authored by Trump for peak drama.
FWIW on the racism, I remember seeing a vid clip of Trump saying one of his favorite movies is ‘Gone With the Wind’. When I watched Tim Scott tell Trump ‘he just loved him’, I thought of Hattie McDaniel’s character.
Bitey
01/27/2024 @ 6:59 pm
When I saw Senator Scott do his semi-circle approach, surely to get away from Trump’s whip hand, I thought of “Django Unchained” character Stephen, played by Samuel L. Jackson. Trump may have wanted Coke commercial style harmony, but that is just another Trump fraud. Tim Scott is decidedly Un-Cola. He has the caramel coloring, but he came across as lemon-slime sweetness. (And was he wearing a jockey outfit and holding a lantern, or is that my liberal racism talking?)
Suzanne
01/27/2024 @ 7:57 pm
Well, and slimy-sliminess has nothing to do with race, as we saw with petal pink Kevin McCarthy running down to Mar-a-Lago for a photo op apres Jan. 6. Trump practices equal opportunity humiliation, e.g. Ben Carson, cabinet Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, skilled brain surgeon that he was, and Rick Perry, cabinet Secretary of Energy, wearer of eyeglasses w/non-prescription lenses.
Someone sent me this after the jury decision yesterday for E. Jean Carroll. I have no idea who the poster is, so cannot attribute. Sorry, hilarious person whoever you are.
Bitey
01/27/2024 @ 9:27 pm
I love that haiku.
Not sure I have ever said that before.
JP Hart
01/28/2024 @ 2:43 pm
Which is akin to saying that Patsy Cline’s ‘Three Cigarettes in an Ashtray’ inspired Buckminister Fuller’s geodesic dome {…} conjecture, like the galaxy, is infinite {…} hence, Michael Shall Row the Boat Ashore (Huckleberry Finn archived for the time being) & perhaps the perfect BOT shall be our ROWBOT. Certainly navigation like existentialism is when to bail and when to sail and when to pass that jug of ale mojo ridin’ emoji implied! Time and daylight permitting, be sure to purvey Richard Wright’s ‘HAIKU'{…} Hey!: restless that wayward wind!
Art Stone
01/29/2024 @ 5:44 pm
I thought that Sen. Scott’s groveling was dispiriting (to be polite) to see.
Waiting for a serious candidate to emerge.
JP Hart
01/30/2024 @ 2:35 pm
RR Sue and I are diaphragm breathing as the acrylic dries on our tactile U.S.A. puzzle map.
‘Three Cheers for Old Notre Dame’ she asks, and I go: ‘On Wisconsin’ {…} at once only the bubbles
of that azure water hot tub {…} cure cancer by Flag Day she whispered crying. It’s alright I said.
koshersalaami
01/30/2024 @ 10:15 pm
Firstly, love the haiku.
Great use of the Grey Poupon ad.
What happens when a member of a group is thought to be treasonous? That’s how I feel about antizionist Jews. I think they’re deluded. I think they are sucking up to others in the hope that they’ll be accepted. I think, to use an overused expression, that they’re putting gas in the car that wants to run them over. They might say in reply: My fellow Jews do not have the right to tell me what to think. To assume that I will think something because I’m Jewish and that I do not have the right to think that because I”m Jewish is antisemitic.
Does this sound terribly familiar?
Most of us think one way, but what does that mean? The majority, after all, is not always right. Sometimes they are. Minorities in particular hear what the people they view as oppressing them say and minorities watch their actions. The iconoclasts aren’t courageous in this case. They’re just ignoring what they don’t want to be true. We hope they’ll figure it out, but we doubt it.
Funny thing about the Tim Smiths of the world: When the majority, the would-be oppressors or, in America’s case, the oppressors in denial while they do it, want to know something about the minority, they go to the Tim Smiths of the world. But here’s the thing:
Tim Smith isn’t chosen because he represents the most general Black point of view. He’s chosen because he doesn’t, and then they pretend that he does. He’s asked when there are truths they don’t want to be told and the untruths have credibility to some people if they come from someone who looks representative.
And so the Tim Smiths help the cowards they hang out with, the cowards who are afraid to learn the truth, the cowards who are far more concerned about looking wrong than being wrong. The Tim Smiths can be embraced. In some ways, the Trumpists are relieved not to hate him because he is Black, at least the ones who don’t hate him because he’s Black. “I don’t hate Black people, I hate Blacks who think they’re oppressed.” Yeah. He doesn’t hate Black people, he just hates over 90% of Black people, the ones who notice.
Is it racist to say Tim Smith doesn’t agree with most of his ethnic people? Naah, that’s just true. Is it racist to say he should? No. Does he owe his people agreement? Some might disagree on that. Possibly not, but then he has no call to object to his ostracism, because he does what he does at the price of helping people ignore or hide what they do to his people.
Right now, that’s the best I can do. Maybe in the morning I’ll change.
Bitey
01/30/2024 @ 10:40 pm
You did quite well. The senator’s name is Scott, but he is hardly worth getting it right. He could be called much worse.
Trying to be objective about people like Tim Scott is perplexing. He is entitled to not pay any dues, our recognize and such need for dues, to be paid in the interest of the greater good. He is entitled to attach himself to power, and quarry the boards and the beams of the structure of social justice, in order to burn them in his fireplace to warm his feet. Within the definition of freedom, and the respect of the concept, his prodigal son strategy has to be allowed.
The only argument I can make against it is not truly an argument against it. It is actually the edge of the argument for tribe.
And…I’m ok with that.
koshersalaami
02/01/2024 @ 12:48 am
I don’t have a problem with being tribal either.
Alan Milner
01/30/2024 @ 11:03 pm
I am quite often quite embarrassed that I have to vote Democratic because they are so god damned bad at public relations, which might have something to do with the fact that the media is more or less owned by Republican/Right Wing entities, either directly or through the realities of the marketplace. What troubles me most is that the Black-Jewish alliance has broken down badly, with dire consequences for both communities. Please argue against that position.
Bitey
01/30/2024 @ 11:15 pm
There are blessings to being born Black. I don’t think I could list them all, but one I am certain is worthy of mention is that I am NEVER embarrassed about my principles. Having had a fairly cushy upbringing, I had plenty of opportunity to face absurd notions about my qualified humanity. One thing is for fuck certain, the Democratic Party has supported civil rights for me, and rights for women.
I don’t understand why white men find this hard to grok. Doing the right thing, or being in the right place does not always come with praise. Frankly, often it comes with scorn. The way we, Black people, learn about and are raised within Christianity is to expect persecution for your principles. MLK Jr was murdered for his principles. Jesus was murdered for his. As a principle, it isn’t worth anything if it does not come at a cost. Embarrassed? Are you kidding me?
Suzanne
01/31/2024 @ 8:36 am
Alan, during the DNC meddling with the Obama vs Clinton presidential primary campaigns, I switched my MA voter registration from Dem to unaffiliated. We have a deep bench of good people in Congress: Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Katherine Clark, Jim McGovern, Ayanna Pressley, and I have voted Dem 100% of the time since 1971.
Yet as an unaffiliated voter, I am free to request a Repub ballot, something I might do in our state presidential primary if Nikki Haley is still in the race. I’m not her fan, but MA is so deeply blue (Trump doesn’t even come here to rally) that my primary vote wouldn’t change the outcome, except to make me feel good. In November though, I’ll crawl through broken glass to vote for Biden.
Other perks of being registered as unaffiliated are I’m no longer solicited daily for money by the DNC, whom I don’t support, and donate directly to candidates whom I do support. Also, I suffer zero embarrassment as a big D Democrat.
I’d guess in CA you have a similar opportunity, perhaps as a registered Independent? We don’t have that label here, but I like the word Independent more than unaffiliated.
koshersalaami
02/01/2024 @ 12:58 am
Why argue against it? The tin ear of Democrats drives me stark raving nuts. It has for years.
Suzanne
01/31/2024 @ 7:50 am
Firstly, I love that Steve called the senator Tim ‘Smith’ 😆
Secondly. You guys. This is some good writing that I’m glad I read.
Thirdly, what was said about minorities includes women. Noted: Marjorie Taylor Greene also on that stage with Tim Scott, I mean Smith. These observations about Black and Jewish people are also true for female people, which is why women are celebrating E. Jean Carroll’s court victory with particular enthusiasm and noisy schadenfreude. Every now and then, someone receives long overdue and well deserved justice. I’d bet money that the haiku poet is female.
koshersalaami
02/01/2024 @ 12:59 am
Women function as a minority