The Democratic electoral impeachment mistake

If you read Daily Kos or Salon.com, you’ll read all about how the Republicans will be in trouble because the majority of the American public wants testimony at the trial.

Bullshit. They won’t be in trouble.

This is like saying that Trump will lose because the majority of voters won’t vote for him.  The majority of voters didn’t vote for him in 2016, and yet where is he?

It doesn’t matter that the majority of Americans want testimony or even if the majority of Americans want Trump removed. What matters is where those Americans live. If the majority of Americans in Red states don’t want him removed and don’t want the Impeachment hearings conducted like a legitimate trial (which it sure as Hell is), there will be no consequences to the Senators from those states for violating their oaths of office and protecting their guy at the expense of the Constitution.

They’re getting away with a lot of crap already. Let’s go to the obvious and observe that they’re complaining that the President didn’t have a voice in the indictment process in the House. The House in Impeachment proceedings functions as a Grand Jury. Defense attorneys never have a role in Grand Jury proceedings. They don’t defend at the indictment phase, they defend at the trial phase. The President should not have had a voice in the House proceedings because that’s how American trials work and have worked for over two centuries. Have you seen the NYTimes say this? Have you seen the Washington Post say this? Hell, I’m not sure Rachel. Maddow has even said it. Democrats should be repeating that over and over, specifically comparing the House to a Grand Jury. They’re not. Why not? A lot of Congress is comprised of lawyers, who should know better.

One of these days I suppose I’ll get fed up and write a letter to the Post (because I’m at least a digital subscriber to the Post, which I’m not to the Times) and say that they ought to turn political coverage over to the Sports desk. Why? Two reasons:

  1. The Sports desk are better scorekeepers, which is really all the Political desk does these days.
  2. Unlike the Political desk, everyone at the Sports desk holds the integrity of the game as their highest priority.

That’s not how political coverage, the “fourth estate,” works any more. They face a choice between impartiality and objectivity, which used to overlap a great deal and now hardly overlap at all. Being impartial rewards whichever party acts worse. The press has overwhelmingly opted for impartiality over objectivity – because the accusation of bias stings so badly, in spite of the fact that they tolerate it from Fox News just fine – and, in doing so, has betrayed American democracy to an insane extent.

I don’t see an end in sight. Money from businessmen will continue to back Trump, in some cases suicidally because they’re killing America’s customer base. We keep hoping someone will do something. Even the intelligence services and the Pentagon hope that someone will do something. We have reached the point where American democracy would have a better shot if we had a military coup for the simple reason that the Pentagon and intelligence services are now more serious about safeguarding democracy than the Republicans are.

 

Loading