How will you know if the news is real or fake?
Sometimes I get emails from a site called Quora. Quora is a site where people pose questions and whoever feels like it answers them, with or without listing credentials. I sometimes find questions I’m interested in answering (as one of many, normally) either because I feel like teaching or because I feel like countering a bad assumption or misrepresentation of what I consider to be accurate. This morning I saw an interesting question. It is the title of this piece. So I just started writing. I kind of like what I wrote so I figured What The Hell, I’ll post it on Bindlesnitch.
The first way is to check it from other sources.
The second way is to examine your source. The main question to ask yourself is: Is this source obviously trying to tell me how to feel? Are you hearing a lot of outrage from all the reporters and commentators? If that’s the case, you’re not listening to a news organization, you’re listening to a sales organization. Information from sales organizations pretending to be news organizations should always be suspect because they’re not presenting information for the sake of keeping you informed, they’re pushing an agenda.
The third way is to evaluate what you’re hearing and asking yourself if it makes sense. Does the action being reported have an obvious motivation based on typical motives rather than stereotypes? If the ostensible motive is pure evil and you’re not dealing with a serial killer the news is probably fake. If the news is too good to be true it’s probably fake.
The fourth way is to look for gross generalizations, particularly if they’re attached to accusations. Gross generalizations are rarely true. “The liberals are trying to…” “The Muslims are trying to…” “The [fill in the large group] agenda…” Generally, as soon as you read something like that you know that there’s a high probability it’s fake.
The fifth way is to look for things being named to make you feel a certain way. Again, this is not reporting, it’s sales. For example, we know what inheritance taxes are. We’ve known that for a long time. If you read it or hear it referred to as a “death tax” you can see that someone’s trying to charge the conversation emotionally rather than relying on analysis. The word “socialist” is rarely used accurately and rarely used truthfully. The same is true of the word “Nazi.” The same is true of the word “Zionist.” The same is true of the word “Sharia.”
I hope this is helpful. I’m just figuring this out as I write because I’ve never really analyzed the question in detail before.
jpHart
02/13/2022 @ 11:15 am
Xi has the Olympiad, our Biden has the Super Bowl, hence Putin is compelled to ‘play’ hostage taker. Journalism can be vetted. Words immortal: Death Shall Have No Dominion, Welsh poet Dylan Thomas … 1933 … expounds post haste mysterious conjecture as well as an accelerant to keep on writing songs within the afterglow. Whereas I’d penciled this holy day to delve STEM – ishly upon the Sea of Azov. Perhaps reincorporating an aphorism with Asimov. You know: 3 robots?
Truth is not a business.
koshersalaami
02/13/2022 @ 11:39 am
Truth is not a business.
That’s really well put.
Ron Powell
02/13/2022 @ 2:32 pm
“In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
–George Orwell
If this quote, commonly attributed to Orwell,
carries any legitimacy or veracity at all, then it might also be said that:
In the age of universal proliferation of disinformation and misinformation, finding the truth is as heroic and revolutionary as speaking the truth.
koshersalaami
02/13/2022 @ 3:08 pm
It should take less effort but right now it doesn’t. Sources have to be scrutinized.
I do this with Left sources too. I sometimes get emails from Daily Kos, though I don’t think lately. I trust them for facts but I don’t trust them for interpretation. Their writers tend to be a little on the loose cannon side. Either that or too young to know enough idioms (or both). For example, a writer once complained about a Republican saying about some Democrat or other “He should be taken out and shot.” I’m old enough to know that that’s a common hyperbolic expression. The writer thought the Republican was actually suggesting an execution and was of course very agitated about that. Uh, no. Republicans do enough that really is awful without having to exaggerate.
jpHart
02/17/2022 @ 3:16 pm
Memory of Azov Egg … fantastic image … thoughts, please, koshersalaami … I’m wondren’ if Russia has a version of our Veteran Hospitals … and are we to presume that President Putin has a ‘plan B’ for potential mutiny of his tankers? My goodness he’s already blown up incalculable resource thus far. Wondren’ if we ought simply ‘pass the proverbial hat’ proffering say, a forte night in Mar-a-lago wherein they could all feast on spanferkel and spike the punch bowl with vodka. You know, pitch n’ put. Fleckin’ A! We didn’t start the fire! Military madness, hey? No doubt the world would be better off if
if he were paranoid in paradise. Close to the Devil’s Triangle, too!
JP Hart
05/02/2023 @ 1:22 pm
DEMOCRACY: ‘some assembly required!’ Startlingly my television reel of the 2023 White House Correspondents’ Dinner imaged the timeless Johnny Robish elbowing with the best and the brightest. His expression seemed to ask, ‘… where’s the champagne fountain …?’
koshersalaami
05/03/2023 @ 2:57 pm
That’s a name I haven’t heard in forever