Seeing the Capitol
I’m in the District. For those not familiar with the term, it’s local parlance for Washington, DC, as New Yorkers know NYC as “the city.” I’m here for Valentines Day, taking my wife out of town to a hotel that treats us very well, welcomes our dog, and contains a restaurant with way better food than I can get in greater Binghamton, NY. For those of you seriously conversant with District geography, I’m staying around the block from Ford’s Theater. I know that because I found it walking my dog. Here’s what it looked like a few minutes ago:
My family moved to Suburban Maryland when I was fifteen years old. I lived in the area, a combination of Maryland and the District itself, until I was just short of forty-two, and I continue to work a lot in the area when COVID allows me to make sales calls. I have seen the United States Capitol a whole lot of times. I’ve even done a speaker demo in it. I’ve had a tour (with Jonah, my mother, and my stepfather) of the Capitol with a Congressional staffer, I don’t remember if it was with my Representative at the time or Senator. I saw it for the first time as a visitor with my family when I was five or six years old.
So we’re driving toward the hotel, coming in from the BW Parkway to Rt. 50 W, which turns into NY Ave and eventually gets to the hotel neighborhood, just south of Chinatown. At one point we cross North Capitol Street. As you might guess from the name, North Capitol Street goes due north from the Capitol building. So I saw it, just for a second or two. It was blocks away but it’s big and at night it’s lit up. It’s gorgeous. When I lived around here – and even when I come back to work and am taking someone around I work with who has never been here – I drove my visitors around the District at night because the monuments look really cool lit up.
Seeing it was jarring. I’ve never had a negative reaction to it before. It means something different now. It used to inspire confidence. I didn’t always agree with what happened in there, God Knows I didn’t, but it still housed the most consequential legislature in the world.
Now it’s been violated. Now some woman abuser walked through its halls saying Nannnnceeee, almost Come out, come out, wherever you are, which in this case happens before abuse. To our House Speaker. Seven deaths. Two Capitol Policemen have committed suicide in the aftermath. Roughly 150 police officers injured. Our key legislators, including the Vice President, were lucky to escape with their lives. No one can legitimately claim to support The Police when they approved of what was done to the Capitol Police.
But the violation is not what’s worst. What’s worst is how many Congressmen and women, Senators, and millions and millions of Americans are OK with this. They’re fine with no consequences for this. Four guys at Benghazi is national betrayal but invading the United States Capitol is not.
It’s not just that the Capitol has been violated, it’s that it still isn’t safe, or isn’t safe any more. From Americans. This is, and I mean this very nearly literally, sacrilegious. It is pissing in America’s holy temple. It is saying that what makes America great has no value. We aren’t like other countries. We aren’t ethnically identifiable. We became a country because our government was different.
Now it’s just the Reichstag. It’s just something that can be burned with millions and millions of Americans just not giving a shit. Not the majority, thank God, but way more than I would have thought possible. This will be confirmed in a really horrible way if Trump is acquitted. A man can cause this and betray his oath of office deeply and suffer no consequences for doing so.
It’s not that I want Trump to suffer. I don’t care if he suffers. His suffering doesn’t buy me anything per se. But I don’t want my country to tolerate this. I don’t want my country thinking this is OK, acceptable, anything other than something that should be punished and punished severely just to indicate that We Don’t Do This.
And there are no excuses. Part of our responsibility as citizens is to look for the truth about our country, by which I don’t mean find something we’re comfortable with and go with it. We know the election wasn’t stolen. We know it was carefully monitored. We know that Republican official after Republican official, both state officers and judges, have consistently found that there was no significant voter fraud. Embracing a comfortable fairy tale at a cost of seven dead and 150 police officers injured is not acceptable. They all have the means to look into it.
For God’s sake, if you’re going to live here, learn to be an American. Immigrants understand this. Why don’t QAnon believers and Trump followers?
Ron Powell
02/12/2021 @ 11:26 pm
“…But I don’t want my country to tolerate this. I don’t want my country thinking this is OK, acceptable, anything other than something that should be punished and punished severely just to indicate that We Don’t Do This.”
There is no middle ground here, no middle of the road..
There is no place or room for debate or compromise…
“if you’re going to live here, learn to be an American.”
koshersalaami
02/12/2021 @ 11:47 pm
No, there is no middle ground here. You’re either utterly horrified and outraged by this or you’re not. This opposite isn’t a continuum, it’s bipolar. This is a digital 0 and 1.
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 1:50 am
Bipolar: having or marked by two mutually repellent forces or diametrically opposed natures or views…
Digital 0 and 1 is binary computer language.
All data in a computer system consists of binary information. ‘Binary’ means there are only 2 possible values: 0 and 1.
Though there are some connotative similarities, binary and bipolar are not synonymous….
Hence not interchangeable…
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 9:05 am
But both are descriptive of the phenomenon. One means two extremes, the other means two choices. I find most opposites are continuum opposites, but this one is not. This is either a valid form of political expression or a punishable one. Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater is either protected free speech or it’s not, and one has to have a faulty understanding of the law to believe that it is. Causing seven deaths plus two more by suicide, causing roughly 150 police injuries, nearly causing the lynching of the Vice President, nearly causing the deaths of other Congressmen and Senators, all to disrupt a Senate vote is either punishable or it’s not.
I guess one aspect of this is expected. People who favor the deliberate mass disenfranchisement of voters would logically approve of the overturning of a legitimate election.
One can’t be a patriotic American and not believe in the moral validity of elections. America is based on that proposition. America was created specifically because of an objection to not having that. Taxation without Representation. Representation. Invalidating Representation is treasonous.
There’s an old story about a mother who watched her son graduate from basic training. Her son Jim was parading with the other graduates and she said “Look! Everybody’s out of step but Jim!” The absurdity of this story is obvious, and yet it describes Trump’s followers precisely. Republican judges and election officials are either unanimous or close about the validity of the election. Our elected representatives in Congress are, for better or worse, exactly that: elected. The man claiming an invalid election did so Before The Vote. The only way to conclude this man is right is to exercise deliberate self-delusion. It is to commit oneself to being a sheep. That isn’t citizenship. It’s the opposite. In this case it’s treason.
If the vote in Congress is to acquit, it will stand because those who voted to acquit have a legal right to acquit. They don’t have the moral right, but they have the legal right.
But a precedent is a precedent. If (and this is impossible but Republicans don’t know that) an outgoing Democratic President manages to get, I don’t know, Antifa do to this, remember this precedent. Once he’s out, Congress can’t touch the former President.
Assuming as we currently do that the Senate will acquit. If not, thank God I will be wrong.
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 3:59 pm
I was unfortunately right
jpHart
02/13/2021 @ 4:03 am
Not far from the Outer Banks either.
International like John Wayne LAX.
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 10:47 am
“Though there are some connotative similarities, binary and bipolar are not synonymous….”
“…both are descriptive of the phenomenon. One means two extremes, the other means two choices.”
We’re on the same page….
When discussing the phenomenon in question let’s be sure not to confuse or conflate the two separate and distinct descriptions….
Resolution of the issue or solutions of the problems the issues present must be couched or predicated on the phenomenon being described as two extremes on the one hand or two choices on the other…
The Senate Republicans have created a dilemma for themselves that is predicated on a false dichotomy or false choice between that which is moral and that which is legal…
“I solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be,) that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of , now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: so help me God.”
The fact is that when placed within the context of the Senate jurors’ impeachment oath, the only ‘choice’ that is both moral and legal is a vote to convict.
By definition, the creation of a false choice or a predetermined decision is a violation of the oath.
When Lindsey Graham and other senators sought to confer with Trump defense lawyers, they clearly demonstrated that their oath of impartiality is of no value or consequence to them…
For them to describe themselves as being caught on the horns of the dilemma of the moral v legal dichotomy, is a hypocritical lie that they find comfort in telling themselves…
We shouldn’t give credence to, or compound it by, discussing it as if it had any validity or merit.
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 11:15 am
The only dilemma is a political one. There is no legal or moral dilemma. If there were, then we could expect the same Senators to have the same dilemma if this were a Democratic former President and there is no way in Hell or this universe that would happen.
On the other hand, if a Democratic President pulled this on the way out, Democratic Senators would mostly if not all vote to convict.
Bitey
02/13/2021 @ 1:32 pm
You two are into an interesting structural analysis. Binary, if I understand it correctly, actually offers more than two choices as a language. Either/or is the first choice. ‘Not and’, meaning the exclusion of both. ‘Nor’, meaning the exclusion of both. So, when used in circuitry, it includes a middle ground. Again, this is just structural.
The lack of a middle ground can be assumed and perceived, but it tends to flatten and limit thought. You’re both aware, I’m sure, that the invention of “0” made science come alive. Zero is essentially a middle ground between two realms of reality. It exploded a previous assumption that had existed for millennia.
This conversation’s context explores whether “0” exists ethically or morally…with regard to this particular question. I am inclined to agree with both of you, but structurally, I know that there is possibility that a middle ground exists.
Bitey
02/13/2021 @ 1:34 pm
Correction:
Not And would mean the exclusion of both as a possibility, not “exclusion of both”.
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 2:07 pm
Except that in computer language there are zeros and ones. No twos. There is not, to my knowledge, a third option. 0 and 1 is essentially Off and On. There may be more options coming but not in this protocol. For choices, add bits. One bit two choices. Two bits four choices (0/0, 0/1, 1/0, 1/1). Three bits eight choices (0/0/0, 0/1/0…1/1/1). Four bits sixteen choices, etc.
Bitey
02/13/2021 @ 2:28 pm
I have to defer to the both of you. I think you’re right. My mind has been weakened in the last few days trying to contemplate the position of Trump’s defense. The position is poisonous nonsense intellectually, and I have difficulty finding the breadcrumbs pointing the way back to reality. Trying to give it the benefit of doubt has destroyed my trail.
Their position is purely immoral and nihilistic. I am worried that it makes reason untenable, and ultimately democracy untenable.
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 2:52 pm
As I said at the end of my post on the matter, the summary of the defense is:
He did it…so what!
The defense is no defense because of the Republicans’ predetermined and overt craven desire and crass willingness to violate both their oaths as United States Senators and, as impeachment jurors.
The spectacle is totally pathetic…
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 2:39 pm
“By definition, the creation of a false choice or a predetermined decision is a violation of the oath.”
“For them to describe themselves as being caught on the horns of the dilemma of the moral v legal dichotomy, is a hypocritical lie that they find comfort in telling themselves…”
Their ‘dilemma’ is a fictiontion of their own making.
We both know that there is no real dilemma here….
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 3:04 pm
Ron,
You are correct. There is no dilemma.
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 3:00 pm
Bitey,
It’s far easier to understand, but harder to accept, that there is no honesty here. This is a choice made about power. It has nothing, and I mean nothing, to do with ethics. This is entirely cynical. This is power over patriotism. This is a devaluing of democracy, pure and simple. What you are wrapping your head around is essentially evil. I don’t mean this from a partisan standpoint because this isn’t intrinsically about ideology, it’s about comparative valuing of democracy. I guess we never understood how right Hillary was about deplorables. This is the most profoundly unpatriotic thing imaginable. I feel like Ann Coulter feels about Democrats and liberals. I think the other side is treasonous. I’m not being hyperbolic, I’m being literal. This is We Lost, Fuck Democracy.
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 3:53 pm
57-43, not 2/3. 7 Republicans voted in favor of conviction
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 7:08 pm
Re Democracy v Lunacy:
Ladies and gentlemen, you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet!
koshersalaami
02/13/2021 @ 7:16 pm
That’s what I’m afraid of
Bitey
02/13/2021 @ 7:07 pm
As a mildly interesting aside, Van der veen was a college classmate of my wife’s at Ohio Wesleyan. He was a graduate of Choate, so, a child of privilege. From college, he went to Quinnipiac School of Law, which was not accredited until 4 years after he graduated.
My wife has sad many times that there were eastern blue blood kids who attended her college, and never had an interest in academics. They could not get into elite schools in the east, and their families bought their ways into small liberal arts colleges. They mediocred their ways through undergrad, and then went on with their lives. Van der veen eventually started a bottom feeding personal injury practice. He once sued KFC for serving a man “fried rat”…according to the claim. It’s the type of claim that a corporation just tosses to get away from the publicity. That’s who Trump was reduced to as representation. (Interestingly, he recently sued Trump for the mailbox nonsense during the election.)
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 7:15 pm
Both Choate and Quinnipiac are but minutes away from my former home in Wallingford Connecticut…
A exurban headroom town/community midway between Hartford, the state capitol, and New Haven, the home of Yale University, where I now reside…
Bitey
02/13/2021 @ 7:32 pm
I have a handful of Yalie friends…from home. One, Eric Hanson, received a graduate degree in African American studies, and now owns a Jazz label. He lives in Brookline Ma now. Eric would have been a student there in the late 1980s.
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 8:56 pm
I was discharged from active duty with the USAF, at the rank of 1st Lieutenant, on 1 February 1973.
Following that, the first position I held as a civilian was Director of the African American Cultural Center at Yale University at the academic/administrative rank of Assistant Dean…
As informal advisor to both undergraduate and graduate students, I had the unique and distinct pleasure of assisting Henry Louis Gates in navigating the Yale/New Haven environment when he visited Yale to work on his doctorate degree in African American Studies.
“Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr. (born September 16, 1950) is an American literary critic, professor, historian, filmmaker, and public intellectual who serves as the Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and Director of the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University. He rediscovered the earliest African-American novels, long forgotten, and has published extensively on appreciating African-American literature as part of the Western canon.”
—–Wikipedia
He is now the country’s foremost authority on African American History.
Ron Powell
02/13/2021 @ 7:41 pm
Thankfully, I reside in one of the bluest, if not THE bluest, of blue states in the country:
Connecticut is among the richest states in the union is recorded as having one of the highest per capita incomes and the cost of living well here is through the roof and yet:
The Governor and all of the elected constitutional officers holders are Democrats.
The state legislature is majority Democrats.
The entire congressional delegation consists of Democrats,
5 in the House of Representatives and both senators.
Go figure!
The place is full of latte and limousine liberals and tends toward moderate to conservative fiscal and tax policy….
Outside of the sales tax and the climate not a bad place to be….
Jonna Connelly
02/15/2021 @ 12:54 pm
I didn’t read carefully enough to know if you guys ever determined exactly how many 1s and 0s can dance on the head of a pill that treats mental illness but I think what I have to say is more important.
If you can, fly into National airport at night when the monuments are all lit up. That is far and away the most breathtaking view of the place.
And just for fun, when we used to go to DC with my kids when they were 3-7, mostly the national history museum, because they were little kids and would only tolerate that, my 3 year old took to calling the Lincoln Memorial “the Mom-yih-tude”. I still think of it that way.
Jonna Connelly
02/15/2021 @ 1:04 pm
It’s not so much that “they’re fine with no consequences for this” as it is they’re fine with just the little people facing consequences.
koshersalaami
02/15/2021 @ 2:13 pm
I spent more of life around DC than anywhere else. I’ve flown in to National at night.
I also once flew into NY at night past Manhattan. Like with National, if you’re on the right side of the plane, amazing.
In both cases, you can do even better on the surface. In Manhattan’s case, on the water. The view at night from the water South of Manhattan is the most romantic I’ve ever seen.
Alan Milner
02/15/2021 @ 3:42 pm
If you want to see it best, the Staten Island Ferry is the place to go. When I used to ride the ferry, it was deal at five cents a ride. It’s even better today because it is free. Scratching my head over that one.
Alan Milner
02/15/2021 @ 3:45 pm
By the way, if you want a non-sexist pronoun for congressmen and women, try Members of Congress, which suggests either house unless you follow it immediately with a reference to “senators” in which case Members of Congress is understood to mean only members of the House. Better yet: Members of the House and Senate.
koshersalaami
02/15/2021 @ 5:53 pm
Free mass transit would make a lot of sense. The more people use it, the better off the city is.
koshersalaami
02/15/2021 @ 5:54 pm
Also, collecting a nickel a passenger and processing that probably cost them more than a nickel a passenger.