Texas, Take 2
On August 29, 2011, I published a post on Open Salon called “Governor Perry’s Flirtation With Succession.” It actually started life as a comment on Jon Wolfman’s blog. I’m reprinting it here, with an epilogue.
Governor Rick Perry has made a few remarks indicating that Texas secession might be a possibility, remarks whose tone indicated he might be sympathetic to those who advocated such a thing.
Interesting. For those of you who are denizens of what would, in that event, presumably become the Lone Star Republic, let’s look at what secession would actually mean:
The US military would leave Texas, lock, stock, and barrel. No bases. No presence.
So would NASA. Houston, if we have a problem, we aren’t talking to you about it.
So would the postal service.
So would everyone associated with border control or any other kind of law enforcement. Like the FBI.
Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport would cease to be a major hub because it wouldn’t be an American airport any more.
None of your retired people would get Social Security. Neither would Texans with disabilities. No Texan would get Medicaid or Medicare.
You wouldn’t get a dime of highway funding.
Though some of our major professional sports leagues are international, the NCAA is not. The Longhorns and Aggies would play each other and maybe Rice but you can kiss the BCS goodbye. Most high school football prospects from the 49 States aren’t going to consider such a limited market as Texas, though a lot of the Texas high school prospects will be attracted to the far larger American market. Not only won’t your teams play their current opponents, their recruiting prospects will dwindle to the point where the quality of your college teams is likely to land in the toilet.
While we’re talking about colleges and universities, they can all say goodbye to their US government research money. Also their Pell Grant money. Oh, and out of state tuition just became out of country tuition. Both ways.
These are just some highlights of the consequences of secession, or perhaps I should call them “lowlights.” If Texas becomes a country, Texas will have to take on the responsibilities of a country. By itself. You’ll need:
An army, navy, air force, marines, and coast guard. Along with military academies for all of them.
A currency. If I were you, I’d see how much you can hit Jerry Jones up for to get his picture on your dollar.
A postal service. Employees, stamps, trucks, planes, the whole bit.
A State Department. And staffed embassies all over the world.
An intelligence service.
An FAA. You don’t want all those planes crashing.
An INS. We’d get to shift all our guys from the Texas/Mexico border to the Texas/Oklahoma border, the Texas/New Mexico border, etc. Now our border guards wouldn’t have to be bilingual any more, at least the ones who can understand your accent. Yours would, though.
An EPA. Yeah, I know there are probably some Texans who don’t think you need one but, given how big and powerful the Texas oil industry is, you’d better have one if any of you ever expect to breathe again.
If you want to insure that the food supply and drug supply are safe for Texans, you’d need an FDA. If you don’t want your banking and insurance industries to steal you blind, you’d need regulatory agencies for them (such as an FDIC). If you want Texans on the job to keep their arms, legs, and heads, you’d need an OSHA. And on and on.
Oh, and one more thing:
A Constitution. You wouldn’t be protected by the United States Constitution any more. I hope you trust Governor Perry and his friends to write you one. Hey, if Thomas Jefferson and James Madison managed to write one, how hard could it be?
I respectfully submit that secession would be an extremely expensive idea and I do not advise it.
I further think that a man who flirts with such an idea without thinking it through has questionable judgment at best, but the Governor’s judgment may not be the biggest problem here. You see, the thing about most political disputes is that both sides are based on the premise that My Position Is Better For The Country Than Yours. It doesn’t matter if you’re looking at opposite sides of Right to Life/Pro Choice, Tax the Rich/Taxes Are All Evil, Separation of Church and State/Teach Intelligent Design in the Schools, even Gay Rights/Don’t Let Gays Marry, Adopt, or Serve in the Military; generally speaking, the people on both sides of each issue think the United States would be better off adhering to their position.
Most political disputes. Not all. Does Governor Perry actually think Texas secession would be good for the United States? If he wants to be President of the United States, this question becomes extremely relevant.
There are two choices. Neither reflects well on the Governor.
- He believes that Texas secession would not be good for the United States, in which case he is not a real patriot.
- He believes that Texas secession would be good for the United States, in which case he is not a real Texan.
Though there are certainly a few Texans I wouldn’t mind cutting loose, the United States would not derive sufficient benefit from cutting them loose to make up for the tremendous loss that the secession of Texas would entail.
Lyle Lovett and Willie Nelson as foreigners?
No way in Hell.
Part of the original Texas secession movement had to do with not wanting interference from the Federal Government. As such, they made their electric grid separate, which meant that when it froze, they didn’t have access to power from the rest of America.
How well have they done, exactly?
They’ve been without power, at times through nearly the whole state. They’ve been without heat. They were like this because the power grid wasn’t built to hold up to the cold. Well, global warming shifts weather patterns.
They set up billing for power on a free market system, strictly supply and demand. What that meant is that the price of power very suddenly skyrocketed through the roof, with residential electric bills sometimes making their way into five figures. And, of course because people never expected this, a lot of those people had their bank accounts linked to power billing so the money could simply be drawn out. When what’s drawn out passes $10,000 in a month, that leaves them with no money.
And of course they’re represented in Washington by Cancun Ted. We can expect Texas government officials to, uh, fly to Cancun when Texans suffer in an emergency. Kind of reminds you of Joel Osteen, wildly successful televangelist who, a few years ago when Texas was hit with a hurricane, refused to open his church to take in those who needed shelter. So, government officials who hate government and preachers who don’t appear to have a whole Hell of a lot of respect for Jesus. Anyone who thinks a stand like that comes out of the Old or New Testament doesn’t bother to think about either. In fact, a lack of hospitality is the big sin that shows up in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. (I can explain why I say that if you want to ask me. But I’m right.)
And, in the meantime, what is that Nasty Federal Government – with a President who’s a Democrat – doing about Texas’ problems? Giving them emergency aid, of course. Flying in to look, as opposed to, uh, flying Out, Ted. Someone in Washington understands both government and Christianity. That’s quite a change. And that assistance to Texas is made possible, or at least easy, by the fact that Texas hasn’t been stupid or unpatriotic enough to secede, even though they like to bat that idea around.
Taking shots at Texas now is almost too easy.
How many Texans does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You can answer that one yourself.
Bitey
02/24/2021 @ 12:52 pm
This is the perfect time to have another look at Texas’s dreams of being a republic unto itself. This has been a disaster for Texans. I’m tempted to rest of the fact that they brought it on themselves, and they did, but they have been so misinformed with all of that market ideology, and of course the independent republic thing. People are dying because of this nonsense set up that they have constructed for themselves.
koshersalaami
02/24/2021 @ 2:38 pm
Yup. If I weren’t reintroducing an old post, I now realize I could have done this with a one sentence:
Everything you need to know about the Texas crisis can be summarized by the fact that Biden flew in and Cruz flew out.
Ron Powell
02/24/2021 @ 3:01 pm
About 35.5 percent of Texas’ net revenue for fiscal 2016 came from the federal government….
OMB
Re secession:
I’d show them the door…
Ron Powell
02/24/2021 @ 3:10 pm
according to a new study from the Tax Foundation,
federal grants-in-aid to Texas comprise 32.6 percent of the state’s general fund budget, the 28th highest rate among the 50 states…
koshersalaami
02/24/2021 @ 3:39 pm
But that leaves a question: If they’re below the midpoint, what does that say about their proportional giving and taking? Having looked at 2019 percentages, Texas has a smaller share than New York or Pennsylvania but a larger share than California and about the same as Florida.
Jonna Connelly
02/24/2021 @ 3:58 pm
So you seem to be saying you don’t think the free market would take care of all their regulatory needs?
koshersalaami
02/24/2021 @ 4:34 pm
You do realize that I’m likely to answer a sarcastic question with a literal answer, right?
One of the main problems with the view (not stated like this, but certainly meant like this) is the idea that regulation is for the public and a lack of regulation is for the business community. That’s one reason Wall Street normally votes Republican, even though in 2020 they didn’t. Nutcases in the White House are not good for stability. In actuality, regulation is frequently good for business. Stranger than that, regulation is sometimes good for capitalism.
I could explain all that – and, if I don’t stop myself, I compulsively will – but I don’t know what anyone remembers from old posts of mine and I guess I’ll be polite enough to worry about beating dead horses.
Jonna Connelly
02/25/2021 @ 10:41 am
I was counting on it!
I remember your business theory (is that what it is?) lessons quite well and, though the specifics may be lost to old age, continue to appreciate them.
koshersalaami
02/25/2021 @ 11:28 am
More observations than theory. An economy needs regulation like a Ferrari needs a mechanic – both generate forces that can screw them up. Such as: What makes capitalism work is competition, but companies tend to buy each other up, leading to monopolies or near monopolies which kills the competition that makes the system work.Ergo: antitrust regulation. Without regulation unions get squashed, but worker wages drive sales, so squashing labor is capitalism shooting itself in the foot. Then there’s environmental concerns. The problem here is that the capitalism feedback loop doesn’t work. How company actions are supposed to be corrected is by dropping sales driving change, but the primary victims of environmental damage are rarely primary customers of the polluters. In the mean time, pollution can damage other industries (like fishing), meaning that in terms of GDP avoiding pollution can be less costly than living with it. With global warming this will be even more true.
Another problem with company consolidation is that it reduces employment by getting people who fill now duplicated functions fired, even if they were performing well. That takes money out of the customer base.
koshersalaami
02/25/2021 @ 3:59 pm
Why industries can’t self-regulate is because of the lowest common denominator. Whichever company behaves worst sets the tone because the others have to match the behavior to stay competitive. An example:
I buy half gallons of not from concentrate OJ in cartons. Several years ago, Tropicana introduced a low sugar variety but in a slightly smaller carton. It sold fine. They then switched from 64 oz. cartons to 59 oz. cartons with regular OJ, not saying anything but of course changing the numbers on the packaging. Now if you look at Simply Orange or Florida Natural, you’ll see 59 oz. cartons because they had to stay competitive, so the core of the industry now has deceptive packaging that just looks like half a gallon. The same thing happened in conical pints of ice cream. Some of them taper a whole lot. I think Ben and Jerry’s still uses full pints, but a lot of brands don’t. If the first company doesn’t break ranks or if breaking ranks is prohibited by law, we don’t get this deceptive crap. The guys at Florida Natural didn’t necessarily want to do this but they needed to stay competitive.
Jonna Connelly
02/25/2021 @ 8:45 pm
I admire your ability to sort out and break down the various parts of complex processes. I observe such things, they appear in my head as a whole and it all turns into a tangled spiders nest and I have to stop thinking lest my head explode.
Maybe countering that – Minneapolis has been having a building boom for maybe as much as 10 years now. They’re building very high end luxury and low end one bedroom and studio apartments and they just keep building and building and I can’t begin to imagine who the hell is going to live in them all. (Sort of low end, I mean actual “affordable” i.e. low priced places are few and far between. They’re supposedly mostly “market rate” buildings.)
Theoretically, when the market gets glutted it’s supposed to force prices downwards, isn’t that so? But no. Rents, from what I hear, just keep going up. What the developers are doing though is offering x months free rent to attract new renters. (x=1 to 6ish).
My response: the market is a big fat lie and there the simple head goes and blows up again.
koshersalaami
02/26/2021 @ 12:34 am
I don’t know what keeps prices up without demand. If they’re really not being rented, then what you’re describing is their lowering the rent through other means, which is to say free months. If it works. If they stay vacant, rents have to drop.
jpHart
02/25/2021 @ 4:07 am
The GOP does not get to turn the lights off and blame everyone else for the darkness.
jpHart–8 OCT 2013
koshersalaami
02/25/2021 @ 11:17 am
Agreed
jpHart
02/26/2021 @ 8:58 pm
Math Problem Solver
Questions Answered Free
Algebra Geometry Trigonometry Calculus
Number Theory Combinatorics Probability
[…] so if C0. Springs ‘lost’ NASA and/or Huntsville AL. ‘groks AI’ […]
QUANT the futurologists pall-laze ‘gIT’ cirrus ‘boUT-climax-weirdness’?